Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2224 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 13, 2015      TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2224 by Deshotel (Relating to leadership development of public school administrators.), As Introduced   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2224, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,250,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 13, 2015





  TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2224 by Deshotel (Relating to leadership development of public school administrators.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2224 by Deshotel (Relating to leadership development of public school administrators.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Honorable Jimmie Don Aycock, Chair, House Committee on Public Education 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2224 by Deshotel (Relating to leadership development of public school administrators.), As Introduced

HB2224 by Deshotel (Relating to leadership development of public school administrators.), As Introduced

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2224, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,250,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2224, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,250,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2016 ($1,500,000)   2017 ($750,000)   2018 ($750,000)   2019 ($750,000)   2020 ($750,000)    


2016 ($1,500,000)
2017 ($750,000)
2018 ($750,000)
2019 ($750,000)
2020 ($750,000)

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1    2016 ($1,500,000)   2017 ($750,000)   2018 ($750,000)   2019 ($750,000)   2020 ($750,000)   

  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1    2016 ($1,500,000)   2017 ($750,000)   2018 ($750,000)   2019 ($750,000)   2020 ($750,000)  


2016 ($1,500,000)
2017 ($750,000)
2018 ($750,000)
2019 ($750,000)
2020 ($750,000)

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would establish the new grant program for developing advanced leadership development activities in the staff development training of principals and other administrators. The bill would direct the Commissioner of Education to give preference in making awards to school districts, regional education service centers, or institutions of higher education conducting leadership development activities in partnership with a state or national organization that has demonstrated success in the development and implementation of school leadership programs.The bill would become effective on September 1, 2015, or immediately if passed with the necessary voting margins.

Methodology

The bill indicates that implementation of the grant program is subject to appropriations, but does not specify a level of funding for the program. This analysis assumes costs based on three grants of $500,000 each to eligible providers to develop targeted training programs in FY 2016 for total costs of $1,500,000. One of the programs would be targeted to small district administrators. Another program would be targeted to urban district administrators. A third program would provide for a generalized training applicable to any school administrator. Ongoing costs to provide the training for each program are estimated at $250,000 per year for a total annual cost of $750,000 beginning in FY 2017.

Technology

This bill has no identifiable effect on the TEA's technology costs.

Local Government Impact

School districts could apply for a grant to develop and deliver leadership training programs. It is assumed that the grant funds would cover any costs incurred by a school district that applied for and received a grant to develop a leadership training program.

Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency

701 Central Education Agency

LBB Staff: UP, JBi, AM, SL, AW

 UP, JBi, AM, SL, AW