Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2673

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the eligibility of certain persons for the supplemental nutrition assistance program.

Impact

This legislation has significant implications for state laws regulating nutrition assistance. By instituting a five-year ban on eligibility for individuals with felony convictions related to drug offenses, the bill aims to balance social support with concerns over substance use. However, it also sets a precedent that could potentially make recovery and reintegration into society more challenging for those who have faced such convictions, particularly by imposing additional requirements like drug testing after the ban period.

Summary

House Bill 2673 addresses the eligibility criteria for individuals seeking benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in Texas. The bill modifies existing law by establishing that a person convicted of certain felony offenses related to controlled substances is ineligible for SNAP benefits for a period of five years following their conviction. After this period, the individual may regain eligibility, but only if they can pass a drug test for controlled substances not prescribed by a healthcare practitioner.

Conclusion

Overall, while HB2673 seeks to bring specific accountability to SNAP eligibility through the lens of criminal justice, its implementation could lead to larger discussions about the nexus of welfare support, rehabilitation, and public safety. Stakeholders on both sides will need to assess the long-term effects of these provisions on public health and community welfare.

Contention

Critics of HB2673 may argue that the bill disproportionately affects vulnerable populations who are already struggling with the consequences of a criminal record. The permanent ineligibility clause for individuals convicted of serious crimes, such as murder or sexual offenses, raises concerns over the fairness and long-term impact on families relying on SNAP for basic sustenance. Consequently, this element of the bill could lead to debates around fairness and the social responsibilities of the state towards those who have served their time.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.