Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4002

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to an interim study regarding international price discrimination in pharmaceuticals.

Impact

As part of this study, the committee will explore various factors influencing pharmaceutical prices, including the reasons for pricing strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in the international market. The examination will also cover changes in costs attributed to the Affordable Care Act, whether such modifications have had a substantial effect on pricing dynamics. Furthermore, it will assess how much of the public's burden in the U.S. contributes to the international market, particularly in terms of subsidizing research and development costs.

Summary

House Bill 4002 aims to establish a joint interim committee focused on studying the impacts of international pharmaceutical price discrimination on Texas residents and the state government. This bill recognizes the complex nature of pharmaceutical pricing on the global stage and seeks to understand the mechanisms that lead to price differentials across countries. The intent of the legislation is to gather comprehensive data and insights that could inform future policy discussions and legislative actions regarding healthcare affordability in Texas.

Conclusion

In summary, HB 4002 represents an initiative by the Texas legislature to better understand the nuances of pharmaceutical pricing and its ramifications for Texans. By convening an interim committee to investigate these matters, the bill reflects a proactive approach to dealing with the challenges of healthcare costs and price equity in pharmaceuticals. The findings from this study could have far-reaching implications, potentially leading to legislative proposals aimed at improving the affordability and accessibility of medications for Texas residents.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 4002 could arise from differing opinions on the necessity and scope of the study. Stakeholders in the healthcare sector, including patient advocates and pharmaceutical companies, may present opposing arguments regarding the implications of price discrimination and whether governmental intervention is warranted. As the study could lead to increased scrutiny of pharmaceutical pricing practices and potential legislation aimed at regulating such practices, tensions may surface among interested parties with vested interests in pricing structures, accessibility, and healthcare policy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits