Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4027 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 By: Blanco H.B. No. 4027
22
33
44 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
55 AN ACT
66 rel
77 ating to products liability action related to a pharmaceutical
88 product.
99 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
1010 SECTION 1. Section 82.007, Civil Practice and Remedies
1111 Code, is amended to read as follows:
1212 Sec. 82.007. MEDICINES. (a) In a products liability action
1313 alleging that an injury was caused by a failure to provide adequate
1414 warnings or information with regard to a pharmaceutical product,
1515 such as a failure of the manufacturer to place notice to the United
1616 States Food and Drug Administration of a potential safety signal,
1717 there is a rebuttable presumption that the defendant or defendants,
1818 including a health care provider, manufacturer, distributor, and
1919 prescriber, are not liable with respect to the allegations
2020 involving failure to provide adequate warnings or information if:
2121 (1) the warnings or information that accompanied the
2222 product in its distribution were those approved by the United
2323 States Food and Drug Administration for a product approved under
2424 the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. Section 301 et
2525 seq.), as amended, or Section 351, Public Health Service Act (42
2626 U.S.C. Section 262), as amended; or
2727 (2) the warnings provided were those stated in
2828 monographs developed by the United States Food and Drug
2929 Administration for pharmaceutical products that may be distributed
3030 without an approved new drug application.
3131 (b) The claimant may rebut the presumption in Subsection (a)
3232 as to each defendant by establishing that:
3333 (1) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval
3434 or licensing of the product, withheld from or misrepresented to the
3535 United States Food and Drug Administration relevant [required]
3636 information that was material [and relevant] to the performance of
3737 the product and was causally related to the claimant's injury;
3838 (2) the pharmaceutical product was sold or prescribed
3939 in the United States by the defendant after the effective date of an
4040 order of the United States Food and Drug Administration to remove
4141 the product from the market or to withdraw its approval of the
4242 product;
4343 (3)(A) the defendant recommended, promoted, or
4444 advertised the pharmaceutical product for an indication not
4545 approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration;
4646 (B) the product was used as recommended,
4747 promoted, or advertised; and
4848 (C) the claimant's injury was causally related to
4949 the recommended, promoted, or advertised use of the product;
5050 (4)(A) the defendant prescribed the pharmaceutical
5151 product for an indication not approved by the United States Food and
5252 Drug Administration;
5353 (B) the product was used as prescribed; and
5454 (C) the claimant's injury was causally related to
5555 the prescribed use of the product; or
5656 (5) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval
5757 or licensing of the product, engaged in conduct that would
5858 constitute a violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 201 and that conduct
5959 caused the warnings or instructions approved for the product by the
6060 United States Food and Drug Administration to be inadequate.
6161 (6) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval
6262 or licensing of the product, failed to report any adverse event (or
6363 adverse experience), adverse drug reaction or unexpected adverse
6464 drug reaction for the product as defined by the United States Food
6565 and Drug Administration.
6666 (7) the United States Food and Drug Administration
6767 adds or amends a boxed warning as defined by USC ยง201.57(c)(1).
6868 (c) The claimant is entitled to reasonable discovery on any
6969 rebuttable presumption before a dispositive motion under (a).
7070 SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.