1 | 1 | | By: Blanco H.B. No. 4027 |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | |
---|
4 | 4 | | A BILL TO BE ENTITLED |
---|
5 | 5 | | AN ACT |
---|
6 | 6 | | rel |
---|
7 | 7 | | ating to products liability action related to a pharmaceutical |
---|
8 | 8 | | product. |
---|
9 | 9 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
---|
10 | 10 | | SECTION 1. Section 82.007, Civil Practice and Remedies |
---|
11 | 11 | | Code, is amended to read as follows: |
---|
12 | 12 | | Sec. 82.007. MEDICINES. (a) In a products liability action |
---|
13 | 13 | | alleging that an injury was caused by a failure to provide adequate |
---|
14 | 14 | | warnings or information with regard to a pharmaceutical product, |
---|
15 | 15 | | such as a failure of the manufacturer to place notice to the United |
---|
16 | 16 | | States Food and Drug Administration of a potential safety signal, |
---|
17 | 17 | | there is a rebuttable presumption that the defendant or defendants, |
---|
18 | 18 | | including a health care provider, manufacturer, distributor, and |
---|
19 | 19 | | prescriber, are not liable with respect to the allegations |
---|
20 | 20 | | involving failure to provide adequate warnings or information if: |
---|
21 | 21 | | (1) the warnings or information that accompanied the |
---|
22 | 22 | | product in its distribution were those approved by the United |
---|
23 | 23 | | States Food and Drug Administration for a product approved under |
---|
24 | 24 | | the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. Section 301 et |
---|
25 | 25 | | seq.), as amended, or Section 351, Public Health Service Act (42 |
---|
26 | 26 | | U.S.C. Section 262), as amended; or |
---|
27 | 27 | | (2) the warnings provided were those stated in |
---|
28 | 28 | | monographs developed by the United States Food and Drug |
---|
29 | 29 | | Administration for pharmaceutical products that may be distributed |
---|
30 | 30 | | without an approved new drug application. |
---|
31 | 31 | | (b) The claimant may rebut the presumption in Subsection (a) |
---|
32 | 32 | | as to each defendant by establishing that: |
---|
33 | 33 | | (1) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval |
---|
34 | 34 | | or licensing of the product, withheld from or misrepresented to the |
---|
35 | 35 | | United States Food and Drug Administration relevant [required] |
---|
36 | 36 | | information that was material [and relevant] to the performance of |
---|
37 | 37 | | the product and was causally related to the claimant's injury; |
---|
38 | 38 | | (2) the pharmaceutical product was sold or prescribed |
---|
39 | 39 | | in the United States by the defendant after the effective date of an |
---|
40 | 40 | | order of the United States Food and Drug Administration to remove |
---|
41 | 41 | | the product from the market or to withdraw its approval of the |
---|
42 | 42 | | product; |
---|
43 | 43 | | (3)(A) the defendant recommended, promoted, or |
---|
44 | 44 | | advertised the pharmaceutical product for an indication not |
---|
45 | 45 | | approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration; |
---|
46 | 46 | | (B) the product was used as recommended, |
---|
47 | 47 | | promoted, or advertised; and |
---|
48 | 48 | | (C) the claimant's injury was causally related to |
---|
49 | 49 | | the recommended, promoted, or advertised use of the product; |
---|
50 | 50 | | (4)(A) the defendant prescribed the pharmaceutical |
---|
51 | 51 | | product for an indication not approved by the United States Food and |
---|
52 | 52 | | Drug Administration; |
---|
53 | 53 | | (B) the product was used as prescribed; and |
---|
54 | 54 | | (C) the claimant's injury was causally related to |
---|
55 | 55 | | the prescribed use of the product; or |
---|
56 | 56 | | (5) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval |
---|
57 | 57 | | or licensing of the product, engaged in conduct that would |
---|
58 | 58 | | constitute a violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 201 and that conduct |
---|
59 | 59 | | caused the warnings or instructions approved for the product by the |
---|
60 | 60 | | United States Food and Drug Administration to be inadequate. |
---|
61 | 61 | | (6) the defendant, before or after pre-market approval |
---|
62 | 62 | | or licensing of the product, failed to report any adverse event (or |
---|
63 | 63 | | adverse experience), adverse drug reaction or unexpected adverse |
---|
64 | 64 | | drug reaction for the product as defined by the United States Food |
---|
65 | 65 | | and Drug Administration. |
---|
66 | 66 | | (7) the United States Food and Drug Administration |
---|
67 | 67 | | adds or amends a boxed warning as defined by USC ยง201.57(c)(1). |
---|
68 | 68 | | (c) The claimant is entitled to reasonable discovery on any |
---|
69 | 69 | | rebuttable presumption before a dispositive motion under (a). |
---|
70 | 70 | | SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015. |
---|