Texas House Bill HB4202

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the substitution of land within the boundaries of the Harris County Water Control and Improvement District No. 157 after the approval or issuance of district bonds payable wholly or partly from taxes.

Impact

The enactment of HB 4202 would amend existing statutes regarding land use and district management in Texas. It specifically allows districts such as Harris County Water Control and Improvement District No. 157 to adjust their boundaries in a manner that does not disrupt the security for bond payments or invalidate previous elections concerning said bonds. This flexibility supports the district's operational efficiency and aligns land management with public utility needs, further substantiating district purposes outlined in state law.

Summary

House Bill 4202 addresses the land management within the Harris County Water Control and Improvement District No. 157. The bill proposes the substitution of land within the district after the approval or issuance of bonds, which can be funded wholly or partially through tax revenues. This legislative intent aims to provide a mechanism for the district to optimize land use by allowing the exclusion of improperly utilized land and the inclusion of other land that seeks district services.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears positive among stakeholders interested in efficient water management and infrastructure development. There is an understanding that precise land allocation is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of water control initiatives. Additionally, the support from legislators is reflected in the voting history, where the bill was passed unanimously, suggesting strong bipartisan agreement on the necessity of such regulatory adjustments.

Contention

While the bill does facilitate beneficial land substitutions within the district, it may raise concerns regarding land rights and the implications for property holders outside the current district boundaries. Notably, it did not face significant opposition during discussions, indicating a consensus on its potential benefits. However, discussions around similar legislative changes often spark debates on local control versus necessary state-level interventions, a dynamic that could emerge as this bill is implemented.