Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4211

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the creation of the F.M. 2920/Becker Road Municipal Utility District of Harris County; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

Impact

If enacted, HB 4211 would significantly influence state laws related to municipal utility districts and the associated governance frameworks. The bill allows the district to operate within the legal provisions of existing state codes governing municipal utilities, effectively structuring how such districts can manage resources and finances. This may pave the way for future utility districts in Texas, possibly leading to increased local control over essential services. However, the bill does require municipalities within the district's limits to consent to its creation, which necessitates collaboration between local and state governance structures.

Summary

House Bill 4211 focuses on the creation of the F.M. 2920/Becker Road Municipal Utility District in Harris County, Texas. This legislation grants the newly formed district the limited power of eminent domain for public infrastructure purposes and provides the authority to issue bonds. It also allows the district to impose assessments, fees, and taxes to fund various projects. The bill aims to improve local utility management and infrastructure development, particularly concerning road construction and maintenance within the district's specified boundaries. The establishment of the district is intended to serve a public benefit through organized management of utility services and infrastructure investments.

Sentiment

The sentiment expressed during discussions surrounding HB 4211 has been largely positive among its supporters, who view it as a necessary step towards managing local utilities more effectively and facilitating infrastructural improvements. Advocates believe that the bill will enhance economic development through better resource management. However, there are concerns from various stakeholders about the implications of granting eminent domain powers, highlighting the delicate balance between development and property rights. Critics worry about the potential for misuse of these powers, which could adversely affect local communities.

Contention

A key point of contention involves the limited power of eminent domain bestowed upon the district. Many local residents and advocacy groups have expressed apprehension over potential overreach by the district, fearing that the ability to claim private land for public utilities could lead to displacement or undervaluation of property. Furthermore, the processes mandated for the imposition of taxes and the issuance of bonds, although protective in some respects, raise questions regarding transparency and accountability within the newly created district. Continuous monitoring and engagement by local constituents may be necessary to ensure that the district operates in a manner that aligns with the community's needs and rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB558

Imperial Valley Healthcare District: voting districts.

CA AB918

Health care district: County of Imperial.

CA SB1070

Health care district: County of Imperial.

CO HB1447

Transit Reform

CA AB1021

Imperial Irrigation District.

CA SB692

South Fork Irrigation District.

CA AB1889

Santa Clara Valley Water District.

CA AB854

Imperial Irrigation District: retail electric service.