Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB557

Filed
12/19/14  
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the growth or cultivation of industrial hemp for certain research purposes.

Impact

The bill significantly aligns Texas state law with federal regulations regarding the cultivation of industrial hemp. By granting specific permissions for research, it opens the door for institutions to explore the various applications of industrial hemp, potentially leading to advancements in agriculture, medicine, and other fields. This legislation can facilitate academic studies that contribute to broader understanding and applications of hemp, while also potentially boosting local economies through agricultural research initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 557 addresses the growth and cultivation of industrial hemp specifically for research purposes. It amends the Texas Agriculture Code by introducing provisions that allow the Texas Department of Agriculture and institutions of higher education to engage in the cultivation of industrial hemp as outlined under federal law. It defines industrial hemp with a specific concentration of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and sets forth conditions under which individuals affiliated with designated institutions can legally cultivate and possess industrial hemp as part of sanctioned research efforts.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB557 appears to be positive among proponents of agricultural innovation and research. Supporters argue that the bill represents a progressive move that embraces the opportunities presented by the hemp industry. However, discussions may still bring forth concerns regarding the regulation and oversight of industrial hemp, as well as the implications of its cultivation on local agricultural practices. This may lead to a dialogue about the balance between advancing agricultural practices and monitoring the effects of hemp cultivation on communities.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there could be notable points of contention regarding potential regulation and oversight of hemp cultivation. Concerns might arise around the environmental impacts, compliance requirements for institutions, and how this new agricultural sector could affect existing local farmers. Additionally, opponents may raise questions about the legal ambiguities surrounding hemp cultivation and its potential association with marijuana, despite the defined THC limits outlined in the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1103

Controlled substances: research.

US SB331

Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act or the HALT Fentanyl ActThis bill permanently places fentanyl-related substances as a class into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. A schedule I controlled substance is a drug, substance, or chemical that has a high potential for abuse; has no currently accepted medical value; and is subject to regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal penalties under the Controlled Substances Act.Under the bill, offenses involving fentanyl-related substances are triggered by the same quantity thresholds and subject to the same penalties as offenses involving fentanyl analogues (e.g., offenses involving 100 grams or more trigger a 10-year mandatory minimum prison term).Additionally, the bill establishes a new, alternative registration process for certain schedule I research.The bill also makes several other changes to registration requirements for conducting research with controlled substances, includingpermitting a single registration for related research sites in certain circumstances,waiving the requirement for a new inspection in certain situations, andallowing a registered researcher to perform certain manufacturing activities with small quantities of a substance without obtaining a manufacturing registration.Finally, the bill expresses the sense that Congress agrees with the interpretation of the Controlled Substances Act in United States v. McCray, a 2018 case decided by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. In that case, the court held that butyryl fentanyl, a controlled substance, can be considered an analogue of fentanyl even though, under the Controlled Substances Act, the term controlled substance analogue specifically excludes a controlled substance.

US HB27

Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act or the HALT Fentanyl ActThis bill permanently places fentanyl-related substances as a class into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. A schedule I controlled substance is a drug, substance, or chemical that has a high potential for abuse; has no currently accepted medical value; and is subject to regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal penalties under the Controlled Substances Act.Under the bill, offenses involving fentanyl-related substances are triggered by the same quantity thresholds and subject to the same penalties as offenses involving fentanyl analogues (e.g., offenses involving 100 grams or more trigger a 10-year mandatory minimum prison term).Additionally, the bill establishes a new, alternative registration process for certain schedule I research.The bill also makes several other changes to registration requirements for conducting research with controlled substances, includingpermitting a single registration for related research sites in certain circumstances,waiving the requirement for a new inspection in certain situations, andallowing a registered researcher to perform certain manufacturing activities with small quantities of a substance without obtaining a manufacturing registration.Finally, the bill expresses the sense that Congress agrees with the interpretation of Controlled Substances Act in United States v. McCray, a 2018 case decided by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. In that case, the court held that butyryl fentanyl, a controlled substance, can be considered an analogue of fentanyl even though, under the Controlled Substances Act, the term controlled substance analogue specifically excludes a controlled substance.

US HB830

SAFE Act Save Americans from the Fentanyl Emergency Act

TX HB3137

Relating to a medical cannabis research program.

TX HB10

Relating to the creation of the Texas Mental and Behavioral Health Research Institute.

NV SJR10

Urges Congress to take certain actions relating to the therapeutic use of certain psychedelic compounds. (BDR R-801)

TX HB3703

Relating to the prescription of low-THC cannabis for medical use by certain qualified physicians to patients with certain medical conditions.