Texas House Bill HB673

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the amount of certain controlled substances in the body constituting intoxication for purposes of certain intoxication offenses.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will have significant implications for law enforcement and the prosecution of intoxication offenses in Texas. The updated definition of intoxication will broaden the grounds for arrests and charges related to intoxication when controlled substances are involved. Law enforcement officers will need to be trained to recognize and properly document instances involving controlled substances, which may influence the procedural approach to intoxication cases. Moreover, it may lead to an increase in the number of substance-related offenses prosecuted under the law.

Summary

House Bill 673 proposes an amendment to the definition of 'intoxicated' in Texas's Penal Code. The primary focus of the bill is to clarify what constitutes intoxication by including any detectable amount of certain controlled substances in the body. Specifically, it modifies Section 49.01(2) of the Penal Code, indicating that intoxication may occur not only from alcohol consumption but also from the presence of controlled substances classified under various penalty groups of the Health and Safety Code. This shift aims to provide law enforcement with clearer guidelines regarding intoxication related to substance abuse.

Contention

The conversation around HB 673 is likely to involve discussions about public safety and the appropriate limits of intoxication laws. Advocates for the bill argue that it is necessary to address the growing concerns around substance abuse and to help prevent driving under the influence of drugs, thereby enhancing road safety. However, opponents may voice concerns about the potential for over-policing and the fairness of enforcing these laws against individuals who may have consumed minimal amounts of substances without exhibiting any impairment. The balance between effective law enforcement and individual rights may become a point of contention as the bill progresses.