Memorializing Congress to propose and submit to the states for ratification a "Regulation Freedom Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution.
If enacted, the Regulation Freedom Amendment would require that any major federal regulation proposed by the executive branch could only become law if approved by a majority vote from both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This amendment is intended to restore a constitutional balance, ensuring that the voices of the people are represented through their elected officials in opposition to federal regulatory measures. The bill underscores a significant shift in the dynamic between state and federal governance.
HCR54 is a concurrent resolution that memorializes Congress to propose and submit to the states for ratification a 'Regulation Freedom Amendment' to the U.S. Constitution. This proposed amendment aims to address regulatory overreach by the federal government, which is seen as infringing on the liberties guaranteed by the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. The resolution outlines that, while the REINS Act passed in 2013, it is susceptible to future repeal, highlighting the need for a more robust constitutional safeguard against federal regulations deemed excessive by state legislatures.
The general sentiment around HCR54 appears to be supportive among those who believe in limiting federal government power and restoring rights to states. Proponents argue that the amendment would protect state sovereignty and enhance democratic accountability in the regulatory process. However, there may also be reservations from those who fear that such a restriction could inhibit the federal government's ability to respond effectively to issues that require regulation at the national level.
Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of the proposed Amendment on federal authority. Some lawmakers and citizens might argue that reinstating a requirement for federal regulation approval could lead to delays in crucial regulatory responses to pressing issues. The effectiveness and efficiency of government in managing regulations that serve the public interest are central to the debate, with tensions between maintaining individual liberties and ensuring a responsive government structure at the fore.