Honoring the STEPS Program at Austin Community College for its leadership in postsecondary education for Texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
The STEPS Program has expanded its reach and impact dramatically, with enrollment increasing by 370 percent over the past five years. The program now not only operates at its original Highland Business Center but also at additional campuses, including Pinnacle, Hays, and Round Rock. The outcomes for graduates are impressive, with more than 80 percent finding employment and a notable percentage of current students holding part-time jobs. This growth showcases the effectiveness and importance of inclusive educational programs in enhancing the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
House Resolution 3260 honors the STEPS Program at Austin Community College for its significant contributions to postsecondary education for Texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Established in 2004, the STEPS Program was designed to provide adults with various learning abilities a college experience, initially offering just three classes. Under the leadership of program director Mariah Lossing, the program has seen substantial growth and now provides a robust array of vocational training and educational enrichment opportunities.
The general sentiment around HR3260 is positive, reflecting appreciation and recognition for the STEPS Program's efforts. Lawmakers expressed their support for the initiative, highlighting its role in transforming lives and fostering community integration for individuals with disabilities. The resolution's passage by non-record vote indicates widespread agreement among representatives on the value of such educational programs.
While HR3260 enjoys broad support, conversations around funding and resources for programs like STEPS continue to be an area of interest. Advocates argue that sustaining such programs requires ongoing legislative attention and funding commitments. Notably, the resolution acknowledges the challenges faced by educational institutions in providing comprehensive services, but it does not delve into specific funding mechanisms or state policy changes that could enhance these programs further.