Texas Senate Bill SB1185

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to a biennial study regarding occupational licensing requirements.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would enforce a systematic review of occupational licenses, requiring the commission to assess each license at least once every ten years. This could lead to significant alterations in how various professions are regulated in the state, potentially reducing the number of licensing requirements deemed unnecessary or overly burdensome. The bill emphasizes consulting stakeholders, including license holders and those advocating for reduced licensing, ensuring that diverse perspectives inform the final report that the commission submits to government officials every two years.

Summary

SB1185 introduces a framework for a biennial study on the requirements for occupational licensing in Texas. The bill mandates that the commission conduct an analysis on how these licensing requirements may serve as barriers to entry for potential workers in various professions. It aims to evaluate the impact of licensing on unemployment, competition, and consumer prices, while also assessing the potential risks associated with reducing or eliminating these requirements. The study's findings will be used to inform future regulations and potentially reshape the licensing landscape in Texas.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB1185 is cautiously optimistic, particularly among those who support deregulation and workforce entry. Proponents argue that reducing unnecessary licensing requirements could increase job opportunities and stimulate economic growth by making it easier for individuals to enter professions. However, there are concerns expressed by some groups about the potential loss of consumer protections and the risk of harm that could arise from unregulated practitioners. This divide underscores a fundamental debate about balancing economic freedom with public safety.

Contention

Notable contention points include concerns over how reducing licensing requirements may impact quality and safety in various occupations. Critics of the bill warn that the devaluation of professional standards could lead to subpar service delivery in sectors where consumer safety is paramount. Additionally, the bill's reliance on stakeholder input may bring up questions regarding whose voices will be prioritized in the reviews and whether certain professions may be favored over others, potentially leaving vulnerable populations unprotected.