Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1727

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the duties of the Title IV-D agency regarding the establishment, collection, and enforcement of child support.

Impact

The implications of this legislation are multifaceted. By allowing the Title IV-D agency to modify child support orders proactively rather than requiring a formal motion, the bill simplifies processes for families that experience material changes in their situations. The bill broadens the agency's authority, ensuring that they can act swiftly in the best interests of the child. Furthermore, it specifies protocols for governmental information sharing, including expedited responses to information requests, which can promote efficiency in child support enforcement efforts.

Summary

SB1727 focuses on the responsibilities of the Title IV-D agency in Texas concerning the establishment, collection, and enforcement of child support. Aimed at streamlining procedures, this bill revises several provisions within the Family Code. It emphasizes efficient communication between government entities regarding child support orders, enabling faster modification processes based on changes in circumstances. Additionally, confidentiality is fortified regarding information handled by the Title IV-D agency, ensuring sensitive data is managed securely.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB1727 appears positive among lawmakers involved in child welfare and support issues. Proponents of the bill argue that it is a necessary reform to improve the efficacy of child support systems in Texas. They believe that enhancing the agency's capabilities will lead to better outcomes for children and custodial parents alike. However, some concerns may linger regarding the depth of the agency's powers and the potential for mishandling sensitive information.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, some points of contention remain. Critics may raise concerns about the balance of power between the agency and individual rights, particularly around the enforcement aspects and potential misinterpretation of what constitutes a material change in circumstances. Additionally, the expedited process for modifying child support orders may lead to issues of oversight or miscommunications if not handled properly. Nonetheless, the intent behind the bill is to prioritize child welfare by ensuring timely and effective support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.