Texas Senate Bill SB288

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the designation of a portion of State Highway 16 in Young County as the Texas Game Warden Joseph Marshall Evans Memorial Highway.

Impact

The enactment of SB288 represents an enhancement of state law relating to how highways can be dedicated in memory of individuals who have made noteworthy contributions to the state or communities. Such designations help personalize infrastructure projects, fostering a deeper connection between the public and the state's history. The addition of memorial highways allows for a commemorative opportunity that recognizes the sacrifices and service of individuals, specifically those in law enforcement, thus reinforcing community values surrounding public service and conservation efforts.

Summary

SB288 is a legislative act that designates a segment of State Highway 16 in Young County, Texas, as the Texas Game Warden Joseph Marshall Evans Memorial Highway. This act serves as a tribute to the legacy of Game Warden Joseph Marshall Evans, who made significant contributions to wildlife conservation and law enforcement in Texas. The bill includes provisions for the design and construction of markers that will indicate the new highway designation, ensuring that travelers and local residents can recognize the honor bestowed upon Evans.

Sentiment

The general sentiment towards SB288 appears to be positive, with unanimous support evident in the voting history. The bill passed with a vote of 145 to 0 in the House, indicating broad bipartisan support. This reflects a shared acknowledgment among legislators of the significance of honoring individuals like Joseph Marshall Evans who dedicated their lives to serving the community and protecting wildlife. This sentiment may also indicate a larger trend in the Texas legislature of recognizing and commemorating contributions from various sectors, including law enforcement.

Contention

Although SB288 was met with overwhelming approval, it is worth noting that memorial designations can sometimes spark discussions about priorities in highway funding and infrastructure development. Some stakeholders may argue for or against resources allocated to commemorative markers versus other critical infrastructure needs. Nonetheless, such concerns did not appear to pose significant contention regarding SB288, ultimately allowing it to pass smoothly through the legislative process.