Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB531 Engrossed / Bill

Filed 05/22/2015

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    By: Campbell, et al. S.B. No. 531


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum
 selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for
 dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child
 relationship in this state.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subtitle A, Title 1, Family Code, is amended by
 adding Chapter 1A to read as follows:
 CHAPTER 1A.  APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAWS; SELECTION OF FOREIGN
 FORUM
 Sec. 1A.001.  DEFINITIONS; PUBLIC POLICY. (a)  In this
 chapter:
 (1)  "Foreign court" means any court, tribunal,
 administrative adjudicator, or arbitrator outside of the states and
 territories of the United States.
 (2)  "Foreign judgment" means a judgment issued by a
 foreign court.
 (3)  "Foreign law" means a law, rule, or legal code of a
 jurisdiction outside of the states and territories of the United
 States.
 (b)  For purposes of this chapter, the application of a law
 is contrary to the public policy of this state if application of the
 law would:
 (1)  violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the
 United States Constitution;
 (2)  violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the
 constitution of this state;
 (3)  violate good morals or natural justice; or
 (4)  be prejudicial to the general interests of the
 citizens of this state.
 Sec. 1A.002.  PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN
 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS. A court of this state may not enforce a foreign
 judgment involving the marriage relationship if the court finds
 that the foreign court's application of foreign law to the dispute
 was contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 1A.003.  PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN
 ARBITRATION DECISIONS. A court of this state may not enforce an
 arbitration decision involving the marriage relationship if the
 court finds that the arbitrator's application of foreign law to the
 dispute was contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 1A.004.  CONFLICTS OF LAW. A court of this state may
 not apply foreign law to a dispute involving the marriage
 relationship if the court finds that application of the foreign law
 to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 1A.005.  CHOICE OF FOREIGN LAW OR FORUM IN CONTRACT.
 (a)  A contract provision involving the marriage relationship
 providing that a foreign law is to govern a dispute arising under
 the contract is void to the extent that the application of the
 foreign law to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of
 this state.
 (b)  A contract provision involving the marriage
 relationship providing that the forum to resolve a dispute arising
 under the contract is located outside the states and territories of
 the United States is void if the foreign law that would be applied
 to the dispute in that forum would, as applied, be contrary to the
 public policy of this state.
 Sec. 1A.006.  FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A court of this state
 that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit affecting the marriage
 relationship may not decline jurisdiction because a foreign court
 is a more convenient forum if the foreign court would apply foreign
 law to the dispute that, as applied, would be contrary to the public
 policy of this state.
 Sec. 1A.007.  APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. This chapter does not
 apply to a corporation or other legal entity that contracts to
 subject the entity to foreign law.
 SECTION 2.  Subtitle A, Title 5, Family Code, is amended by
 adding Chapter 112 to read as follows:
 CHAPTER 112.  APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAWS; SELECTION OF FOREIGN
 FORUM
 Sec. 112.001.  DEFINITIONS; PUBLIC POLICY. (a)  In this
 chapter:
 (1)  "Foreign court" means any court, tribunal,
 administrative adjudicator, or arbitrator outside of the states and
 territories of the United States.
 (2)  "Foreign judgment" means a judgment issued by a
 foreign court.
 (3)  "Foreign law" means a law, rule, or legal code of a
 jurisdiction outside of the states and territories of the United
 States.
 (b)  For purposes of this chapter, the application of a law
 is contrary to the public policy of this state if application of the
 law would:
 (1)  violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the
 United States Constitution;
 (2)  violate a fundamental right guaranteed by the
 constitution of this state;
 (3)  violate good morals or natural justice; or
 (4)  be prejudicial to the general interests of the
 citizens of this state.
 Sec. 112.002.  PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN
 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS. A court of this state may not enforce a foreign
 judgment involving the parent-child relationship if the court finds
 that the foreign court's application of foreign law to the dispute
 was contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 112.003.  PROHIBITION AGAINST ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN
 ARBITRATION DECISIONS. A court of this state may not enforce an
 arbitration decision involving the parent-child relationship if
 the court finds that the arbitrator's application of foreign law to
 the dispute was contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 112.004.  CONFLICTS OF LAW. A court of this state may
 not apply foreign law to a dispute involving the parent-child
 relationship if the court finds that application of the foreign law
 to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 112.005.  CHOICE OF FOREIGN LAW OR FORUM IN CONTRACT.
 (a)  A contract provision involving the parent-child relationship
 providing that a foreign law is to govern a dispute arising under
 the contract is void to the extent that the application of the
 foreign law to the dispute would be contrary to the public policy of
 this state.
 (b)  A contract provision involving the parent-child
 relationship providing that the forum to resolve a dispute arising
 under the contract is located outside the states and territories of
 the United States is void if the foreign law that would be applied
 to the dispute in that forum would, as applied, be contrary to the
 public policy of this state.
 Sec. 112.006.  FORUM NON CONVENIENS. A court of this state
 that has jurisdiction to adjudicate a suit affecting the
 parent-child relationship may not decline jurisdiction because a
 foreign court is a more convenient forum if the foreign court would
 apply foreign law to the dispute that, as applied, would be contrary
 to the public policy of this state.
 Sec. 112.007.  APPLICATION OF CHAPTER. This chapter does
 not apply to a corporation or other legal entity that contracts to
 subject the entity to foreign law.
 SECTION 3.  Sections 1A.005 and 112.005, Family Code, as
 added by this Act, apply only to a contract entered into on or after
 the effective date of this Act. A contract entered into before the
 effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect
 immediately before that date, and that law is continued in effect
 for that purpose.
 SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.