Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB531

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child relationship in this state.

Impact

The introduction of SB531 is expected to significantly shape how family law is practiced in Texas. By restricting the applicability of foreign laws in legal disputes, the bill potentially limits the influence of international jurisdictions on family-related cases, ensuring that Texas’s public policy remains paramount. This could have implications for families involved in cross-border marriages or parent-child relationships where foreign laws may have applied under previous contracts or arrangements, effectively centralizing legal authority within the state system.

Summary

Senate Bill 531 seeks to regulate the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in proceedings that involve marriage, divorce, or matters affecting parent-child relationships within Texas. By amending the Family Code, this bill prohibits Texas courts from enforcing foreign judgments or arbitration decisions if those decisions are deemed contrary to the state's public policy. Furthermore, it asserts that Texas courts may choose not to apply foreign law if it contradicts Texas's fundamental rights or morals, as outlined in the bill's definitions and provisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this legislation appears divided. Proponents argue that the bill protects fundamental rights guaranteed under the U.S. and Texas constitutions, safeguarding citizens from laws and judgments that may not adhere to their moral or ethical standards. Opponents of the bill, however, question whether it may limit the legal options available to families, especially those involved in international disputes that might benefit from foreign laws. There is concern that such restraints could lead to unjust outcomes for individuals in complex cross-jurisdictional scenarios.

Contention

The main points of contention primarily revolve around the balance of enforcing local public policy versus recognizing international legal principles. Critics express that the bill could act as a barrier to justice for individuals seeking to resolve family law disputes in a manner consistent with their unique circumstances, particularly when foreign laws may offer more favorable resolutions. The debate brings to light the complexities of integrating international legal standards with established state laws, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of how these changes could reformulate family law within Texas.

Companion Bills

TX HB562

Identical Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child relationship in this state.

Similar Bills

TX HB562

Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child relationship in this state.

TX HB498

Relating to the application of foreign laws and foreign forum selection in a proceeding involving marriage, a suit for dissolution of a marriage, or a suit affecting the parent-child relationship in this state.

CA AB692

Employment: contracts in restraint of trade.

AZ SB1619

Employment relationships; remedies

AZ SB1708

Employment relationships; remedies

AZ SB1664

Employment relationships; remedies

CO SB198

Transparency Transactions Medical Care Entities

AZ SB1420

Repeal; right to work