Texas Senate Bill SB670

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the Texas Identification Number system.

Impact

The proposed changes are expected to facilitate a clearer, more efficient process for state agencies in dealing with their suppliers. By mandating that each agency use the Texas Identification Number primarily, the bill aims to reduce duplicative record-keeping and enhance the overall management of state contractor data. The effectiveness of this system is critical for oversight, financial accountability, and ensuring that state funds are used appropriately, which directly impacts state procurement practices.

Summary

SB670, relating to the Texas Identification Number system, aims to enhance accountability and efficiency in the way state agencies manage identifiers for individuals and entities supplying goods and services to the state. This bill amends existing sections of the Government Code to streamline the assignment of identification numbers, ensuring that the Texas Identification Number will serve as the primary identification system for contractors who supply property or services, thereby creating a more organized approach to tracking state suppliers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB670 appears to be generally supportive among legislators who recognize the need for improved management systems within state agencies. The bill's proponents highlight its potential benefits for efficiency and transparency in state operations, whereas some opposition may arise regarding concerns about implementation costs or bureaucratic overload in transitioning to this new system.

Contention

A notable point of contention is whether the immediate implementation of the Texas Identification Number system could lead to practical challenges for existing contractors and state agencies already accustomed to current identification methods. Legislators are likely to debate the feasibility of a swift transition as well as the potential impacts on contractors who might need to adapt to new procedures. The bill calls for a two-thirds majority for immediate effect, which underlines the contentious nature of changing existing identification processes.