Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1187

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to the authority of a captive insurance company to provide reinsurance.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1187 will likely enhance the regulatory framework surrounding captive insurance companies in Texas, making it easier for them to provide requisite coverages for their affiliates. By broadening the types of coverable risks, the bill aims to support businesses in managing their operational risks more effectively. As captive insurance has become a popular alternative for organizations seeking tailored insurance solutions, this legislation is expected to further encourage the growth of this sector in Texas, aligning state laws with industry practices prevalent in other states where captives are more heavily utilized.

Summary

House Bill 1187 addresses the ability of captive insurance companies in Texas to provide reinsurance. The bill amends the Insurance Code to expand the types of entities and risks that captive insurance companies can cover. Specifically, it allows these companies to offer reinsurance for employee benefit plans, liability insurance, credit life and disability insurance, as well as workers' compensation and employer liability policies associated with their affiliates. This change is intended to give greater flexibility to captive insurers in managing risks and resource allocation within their corporate structures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1187 appears generally positive among stakeholders in the insurance sector, particularly among those advocating for expanded options and flexibility for captive insurers. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate better risk management strategies for businesses, while also potentially leading to cost savings. However, there may be concerns about the broader implications of such changes on oversight and regulation, particularly regarding how these captive entities are monitored to prevent potential abuses or under-regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the implications of expanded coverage for operational risks. Critics may question whether the increased authority of captive insurance companies could lead to insufficient oversight or greater risks for consumers if not managed properly. Furthermore, there may be debates regarding the potential for captive insurers to manipulate risk declarations in ways that could undermine traditional insurance markets. Ensuring that adequate regulatory frameworks and transparency measures are in place will be crucial as this bill progresses through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.