Texas House Bill HB1689

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to liability of certain governmental entities in certain workers' compensation actions.

Impact

This legislation impacts state laws by reinforcing the existing framework of workers' compensation in Texas. Specifically, it aims to limit the ability of political subdivisions to be sued outside the protections afforded by the workers' compensation system, thereby maintaining the sovereign immunity that protects government entities from certain liability claims. This legislation is significant in ensuring that government entities remain accountable under the workers' compensation laws while also protecting them from excessive litigation.

Summary

House Bill 1689 addresses the liability of certain governmental entities in the context of workers' compensation actions. The bill amends sections of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code and the Labor Code, clarifying the privileges and immunities available to governmental units that have workers' compensation insurance or accept the workers' compensation laws of Texas. It particularly focuses on political subdivisions, defining their responsibilities and the implications of self-insurance for workers' compensation.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1689 appears to be largely supportive, as indicated by its unanimous passing in the House, where it received 147 votes in favor with no opposition during the voting process. This indicates broad bipartisan support within the legislature, suggesting that the bill aligns with general principles of accountability and risk management in government employment contexts. However, there could be factions within the community that may voice concerns regarding the implications of restricted liability for government entities.

Contention

While there seems to be general agreement on the need for clarifying laws surrounding workers' compensation and government liability, potential points of contention may arise regarding how these changes affect the rights of individuals seeking to claim damages against governmental entities. Critics may argue that altering the landscape of sovereign immunity could hinder workers’ access to justice in situations where governmental negligence is involved. The discussion highlighted a balance between protecting governmental entities and ensuring individuals can seek remedies for injuries incurred while working.