Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1844

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to choice of law and venue for certain construction contracts.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to standardize and strengthen contractual agreements in the construction industry by removing the ability for out-of-state legal frameworks to dictate terms to Texas-based contracts. This shift emphasizes the state's preference for local governance in legal disputes, thereby providing a more predictable legal environment for parties engaged in construction within Texas. Consequently, stakeholders may see enhanced legal protections under Texas law, potentially leading to increased contractor confidence in entering into agreements.

Summary

House Bill 1844 seeks to amend the Texas Business and Commerce Code concerning the choice of law and venue provisions applicable to certain construction contracts. Notably, the bill introduces a voidable provision for any construction contract that includes terms requiring disputes to be governed by the laws of another state or litigated in out-of-state courts. This means that any contractor or related party can opt-out of such provisions, thereby ensuring that the laws of Texas govern their agreements. This change is particularly significant for contractors operating in Texas, as it reinforces local jurisdiction over construction-related legal matters.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 1844 is largely supportive among construction industry stakeholders, including contractors and associations that favor the reinforcement of state law in contractual matters. They argue that it promotes fairness and clarity in construction contracts among Texas-based entities. However, there may also be some contention from those who believe that such a limitation on contractual freedom could hinder the negotiation process, particularly for larger firms accustomed to more flexible legal terms.

Contention

Potential points of contention may arise regarding the implications of voiding out-of-state provisions, as some legal experts express concerns that this could limit contractors' ability to negotiate terms that may otherwise provide protective benefits under different state laws. Moreover, while the intent of HB 1844 is to protect Texas entities, the actual outcomes will depend on how the new provisions are interpreted and enforced in courts. Stakeholders will need to closely monitor the effects on contract negotiations, especially in the context of larger projects that often involve multi-state interests.

Companion Bills

TX SB807

Identical Relating to choice of law and venue for certain construction contracts.

Similar Bills

TX SB807

Relating to choice of law and venue for certain construction contracts.

TX SB361

Relating to indemnification provisions in construction contracts.

TX HB2010

Relating to indemnification provisions in construction contracts.

NJ A4485

Increases bid advertising threshold on certain purchases, contracts, or agreements.

TX HB2093

Relating to the operation and regulation of certain consolidated insurance programs.

MO SB615

Establishes provisions relating to construction contracts

TX HB3604

Relating to enforcement of certain insurance provisions in construction contracts.

NH SB88

Prohibiting state government entities from including specified terms related to labor organization agreements in construction related contracts and grants.