Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB252

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the requirement that certain employers provide advance notice of employee work schedules.

Impact

If enacted, this bill could significantly alter the operational practices of large food and retail businesses in Texas. By stipulating that advance notice must be given for shift scheduling, the bill seeks to reduce the stress and uncertainty employees face regarding their work hours. Employers would have to adapt their scheduling systems and practices to comply with this requirement, potentially necessitating additional administrative processes. Critics may argue that such regulations could impose challenges for employers in terms of flexibility and managing workforce availability, particularly in industries that may deal with fluctuating customer demand.

Summary

House Bill 252 is designed to enhance employee rights related to work schedules at certain retail establishments. The bill mandates that food and general retail establishments, particularly those with over 500 employees and multiple locations, must provide their hourly employees with at least two weeks' advance notice prior to the start of their scheduled shifts. This requirement aims to promote transparency and predictability in work schedules, helping employees manage their personal lives more effectively. It covers not only mandatory shifts but also applies to instances where shifts may be canceled or moved, requiring employers to compensate employees for changes made with inadequate notice.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 252 may reveal differing opinions on the balance between employee protections and employer flexibility. Proponents may assert that the bill is necessary to address long-standing issues faced by hourly workers in retail environments, where fluctuations in scheduling can lead to economic instability for employees. Conversely, opposition may arise from segments of the business community concerned about the financial and operational impacts of mandated scheduling practices. These stakeholders might argue that the regulation could undermine their ability to respond agilely to market conditions and manage labor costs effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A918

Establishes Employer-Based Child Care Assistance Partnership Program in DCF.

AZ SB1173

Public retirement systems; plan election

AZ HB2015

Retirement plans; plan election; rehire

HI SB1252

Relating To Telework.

MI HB4168

Labor: hours and wages; employer offset of wages due an employee in a pay period based on the amount of gratuities the employee receives; prohibit. Amends sec. 4d of 2018 PA 337 (MCL 408.934d).

MI SB1079

Worker's compensation: benefits; requirements regarding wage earning capacity; modify. Amends secs. 301, 313, 354, 355, 361, 371, 401 & 891 of 1969 PA 317 (MCL 418.301 et seq.) & repeals secs. 302 & 431 of 1969 PA 317 (MCL 418.302 & 418.431).

AZ HB2682

Collective bargaining; warehouse employees; quotas.

AZ SB1449

Collective bargaining; warehouse employees; quotas