Texas House Bill HB2707

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the manner in which a bail bond or personal bond is forfeited.

Impact

The bill has implications for the Code of Criminal Procedure, as it alters the existing laws regarding bail bond forfeiture. By setting clear guidelines on the time frame for defendants to appear, the legislation seeks to prevent immediate judgments in absentia and provide a safeguard against arbitrary forfeiture actions. This could lead to fewer cases of unjust forfeitures and allow defendants additional time to prepare for their legal obligations. Moreover, the law continues to govern those bonds executed before the bill's effective date according to the previous statute, indicating a transitional approach to the new legislation.

Summary

House Bill 2707 focuses on amending the procedures surrounding the forfeiture of bail bonds and personal bonds in Texas. The primary change introduced by the bill is the manner in which forfeitures are initiated; specifically, the bill mandates that the name of the defendant must be called distinctly at the courthouse door, and if the defendant fails to appear within a reasonable time, forfeiture will be enacted. This reasonable time is explicitly defined as not less than 72 hours. This adjustment aims to streamline the process and ensure that defendants have a fair opportunity to respond before any forfeiture judgment is entered.

Contention

While the bill aims to improve the fairness of the bail forfeiture process, discussions surrounding it may center on the potential impact it could have on the enforcement of bail conditions. Some lawmakers might argue that the extended waiting period could hinder the recovery process for the state, allowing defendants greater leeway to evade appearance at court. Conversely, advocates for the bill argue that providing a clear timeline for defendants upholds their rights and reflects a commitment to due process. Therefore, the legislation echoes broader themes of how the justice system balances the rights of individuals against the needs of the state.