Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2789

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the creation of a study group to study state unfunded mandates that affect counties.

Impact

The bill aims to identify and evaluate existing unfunded mandates, allowing the study group to assess which mandates could be repealed or limited and how to prevent the emergence of new mandates. By shedding light on these issues, the study group is expected to provide crucial recommendations for state legislatures to consider in order to alleviate the financial strains placed on counties. The final report, which must be submitted by August 31, 2018, will play an important role in shaping future policies and legislative actions concerning county funding and responsibilities.

Summary

House Bill 2789 involves the establishment of a state unfunded mandate study group with the purpose of examining the financial burdens imposed on counties by state mandates. This initiative is designed to address the issue of state regulations that require counties to conduct activities without providing the necessary state funding, effectively pushing local governments to bear costs that they may not be equipped to handle. The proposed study group consists of nine members appointed by key figures within the state government, namely the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the house, with specific representation from rural, urban, and suburban counties. The appointments are to be finalized by October 1, 2017, ensuring a diverse perspective on the issues at hand.

Contention

While the creation of the study group is generally seen as a step towards providing accountability for state mandates affecting counties, there may be discussions about how effectively the group can advocate for the repeal or alteration of established mandates. Stakeholders may debate the potential impacts on public services, local governance, and overall community welfare, raising questions about the prioritization of financial concerns over essential local needs. Furthermore, the outcomes of this study could prompt a reevaluation of the relationship between state and local governments, where the balance of financial responsibilities and governance authority is continuously negotiated.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.