Texas House Bill HB3031

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the procedure for obtaining a right to use state water if the applicant proposes an alternative source of water that is not state water.

Impact

The proposed changes outlined in the bill are set to primarily affect the procedures for applying for water rights within Texas's regulatory framework. These adjustments are anticipated to streamline the application process by minimizing public hearing requirements if no objections are raised within a specified timeframe. By allowing the commission to act without extensive public input under certain circumstances, it aims to reduce delays in granting water rights, which can benefit individuals and businesses seeking to utilize alternative water supplies efficiently.

Summary

House Bill 3031 pertains to the procedures established for obtaining rights to use state water when an applicant proposes an alternative water source that is not state-owned. It aims to amend current sections of the Texas Water Code to make the process more efficient and clear, especially in relation to applicants who wish to utilize non-state water resources for their projects. The bill outlines specific information that must be included in the notice provided by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regarding applications, including applicant details, proposed water uses, and sources of supply.

Sentiment

Reactions to HB3031 appear to vary among stakeholders. Proponents of the bill view it as a necessary modernization of the state's water rights application process, arguing that it promotes responsible resource management and supports economic development. Conversely, opponents are likely to express concerns regarding the potential lack of public engagement and scrutiny in the decision-making process, emphasizing that transparency and community input remain crucial in matters involving environmental resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB3031 may arise from the balance between facilitating quicker water rights acquisition and maintaining sufficient public oversight to protect community interests. The bill's amendments might lead to varying interpretations of 'public interest' in water usage and may draw criticism if stakeholders feel that the alterations neglect the ecological and social ramifications tied to alternative water sourcing. These discussions could frame the bill as either an essential update in water management practices or as a potential erosion of public involvement in environmental decision-making.