Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3980

Caption

Relating to requiring a referendum regarding the use of photographic traffic signal enforcement systems.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3980 could significantly affect state laws regarding local governance and traffic enforcement. It could serve to enhance community involvement in decision-making related to traffic enforcement practices by allowing citizens to vote directly on the implementation of these systems. This democratic approach might increase transparency and public trust, particularly concerning concerns that such systems could be utilized for revenue generation rather than genuine public safety purposes. However, the bill may also hinder local authorities' ability to enforce traffic laws effectively, posing potential challenges in areas with high traffic violations that could benefit from such systems.

Summary

House Bill 3980 establishes a requirement for local authorities in Texas to hold a referendum before operating photographic traffic signal enforcement systems. This bill amends Chapter 707 of the Transportation Code to mandate that a local authority must conduct a public vote concerning the operation of these systems at specified locations within their jurisdiction. The voting proposition would detail each location where the enforcement system is proposed, and if the majority of votes favor the proposition, the authority may proceed with operating the system at those locations. Conversely, if the proposition is not approved, the authority cannot implement or continue operating these systems at the mentioned locations.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 3980 indicate a divide among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill empowers local citizens, allowing them to have a direct say on enforcement measures that impact their daily lives. They highlight that this could prevent misuses of authority by local governments. On the other hand, opponents express concern that requiring a referendum could delay the implementation of necessary safety measures and complicate local governance. Critics fear that it might result in a lack of coordinated enforcement across various jurisdictions, diminishing the intended safety benefits of using photographic traffic systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1407

Driver’s licenses: photographs.

CA SB238

Criminal procedure: arrests and evidence.

CA SB564

Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action.

CA SB683

Privacy: use of a person’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness: injunctive relief.

GA HB10

Georgia Booking Photo Privacy Protection Act; enact

GA HB882

Law enforcement officers and agencies; prohibit posting of booking photograph until individual is convicted

LA SB24

Removes certain limitations on the release and dissemination of mug shots. (8/1/24)

CA AB2045

Driver’s licenses: photographs.