Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB697

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the inadmissibility of certain information in court as evidence of abuse or neglect of a child.

Impact

The potential impact of HB 697 is profound, particularly in the context of family law. By ensuring that voluntary agreements for temporary managing conservatorship are inadmissible as evidence, the bill seeks to encourage parents in crisis to seek help without the risk of punitive measures taken against them. This could lead to more families accessing necessary support and resources from the state during challenging times, ideally resulting in better child welfare outcomes and stabilization of family dynamics.

Summary

House Bill 697 introduces a significant amendment to the Family Code of Texas regarding the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings relating to child abuse or neglect. Specifically, this legislation establishes that a parent's voluntary agreement to temporarily place their child under the managing conservatorship of the state cannot be used as evidence of abuse or neglect in legal proceedings. This bill aims to protect parents who may seek temporary assistance from the state without fear of their actions being interpreted as indicative of wrongdoing or failure in their parental duties.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 697 represents a pivotal shift in how the Texas legal system approaches family law concerning child management and evidence in abuse cases. If enacted, it could redefine thresholds for intervention and reshape legal interpretations surrounding voluntary conservatorships. The success of this legislation will likely depend on how it is received by the legislative body, family advocates, and the courts, as they navigate these sensitive issues.

Contention

While the bill is primarily focused on protecting the rights of parents, it may also raise discussions about the balance between parental rights and child safety. Opponents might express concerns that this provision could hinder the ability of the courts to act decisively in cases where abuse or neglect may be evident. It evokes a critical dialogue regarding how best to support families in distress while ensuring the safety and well-being of children remains the paramount concern of the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.