Texas House Bill HB86

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 11/14/16

Caption

Relating to providing a sales and use tax refund or franchise tax credit for businesses that employ former offenders.

Impact

The implementation of HB 86 is expected to have significant implications for state employment policies. By financially incentivizing businesses to hire those with prior convictions, the bill seeks to dismantle barriers that prevent former offenders from entering the workforce. This could lead to increased job opportunities for this demographic, potentially lessening the burden on state resources related to unemployment and criminal justice. Additionally, it places a spotlight on the necessity of workforce development initiatives and social rehabilitation programs in state legislation.

Summary

House Bill 86 proposes to enhance employment opportunities for former offenders by providing a sales and use tax refund or franchise tax credit for businesses that employ them. Specifically, the bill aims to incentivize employers by allowing a tax refund of 15% of the sales and use taxes paid during a reporting period if they employ at least one former offender in a full-time position throughout that duration. This move is designed to streamline the reintegration of former offenders into the workforce, thereby reducing recidivism rates and supporting economic development.

Contention

While supporters of HB 86 argue that the bill could greatly benefit former offenders and promote social justice, critics may contend that tax incentives might not be sufficient alone to encourage businesses to hire individuals with criminal records. There may also be concerns regarding the accountability and effectiveness of such tax credits, questioning whether they will indeed translate into actual employment opportunities or if businesses will only exploit these measures for financial gain without making meaningful hires. The debate surrounding the effectiveness and adequacy of this approach highlights the ongoing tensions in public policy regarding rehabilitation versus punitive measures.