1 | 1 | | 85R20534 JNC-D |
---|
2 | 2 | | By: Capriglione H.C.R. No. 118 |
---|
3 | 3 | | |
---|
4 | 4 | | |
---|
5 | 5 | | CONCURRENT RESOLUTION |
---|
6 | 6 | | WHEREAS, In the 2015 election, 83 percent of Texas voters |
---|
7 | 7 | | approved Proposition 7, a state constitutional amendment directing |
---|
8 | 8 | | the allocation of a modest portion of sales tax revenue to the state |
---|
9 | 9 | | highway fund for much-needed roadwork; and |
---|
10 | 10 | | WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 employs an accounting procedure that |
---|
11 | 11 | | delays the prescribed diversion of $2.5 billion for highway funding |
---|
12 | 12 | | from the 2019 fiscal year to the following budget cycle; this |
---|
13 | 13 | | effectively double counts $2.5 billion, which will appear on the |
---|
14 | 14 | | books of both the state's general fund and the highway fund during |
---|
15 | 15 | | 2019; and |
---|
16 | 16 | | WHEREAS, In addition to counting the same money twice, this |
---|
17 | 17 | | tactic ignores Section 7-c, Article VIII, of the Texas |
---|
18 | 18 | | Constitution, which requires the state comptroller to shift |
---|
19 | 19 | | designated revenues to the state highway fund from the general |
---|
20 | 20 | | revenue fund in the same fiscal year in which that revenue is |
---|
21 | 21 | | collected; and |
---|
22 | 22 | | WHEREAS, Failure to allocate the designated revenues to the |
---|
23 | 23 | | highway fund in the correct year would contravene both the Texas |
---|
24 | 24 | | Constitution and the clearly expressed desire of an overwhelming |
---|
25 | 25 | | percentage of Texas voters; now, therefore, be it |
---|
26 | 26 | | RESOLVED, That the 85th Legislature of the State of Texas |
---|
27 | 27 | | hereby find that the diversion of sales tax funds from general |
---|
28 | 28 | | revenue to the state highway fund was approved by Texas voters in |
---|
29 | 29 | | 2015 and is required under Section 7-c, Article VIII, of the Texas |
---|
30 | 30 | | Constitution; and, be it further |
---|
31 | 31 | | RESOLVED, That the Texas Legislature affirm that a delay of |
---|
32 | 32 | | this transfer from one fiscal year to another is unconstitutional. |
---|