Texas House Bill HJR25

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 11/14/16

Caption

Supporting the ratification of a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States providing for a balanced federal budget.

Impact

If ratified, this amendment would require that federal legislation does not result in a budget deficit, thereby prompting the federal government to align its spending with revenue generation. This shift would directly alter how federal budgets are constructed and managed, potentially imposing stricter limits on discretionary spending. Moreover, it could lead to significant changes in the federal funding processes for various programs and services that rely on federal appropriations. The long-term implications could affect how states negotiate funding with the federal government as well as how both levels of government prioritize budgets amidst economic downturns.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 25 (HJR25) is a resolution from the Texas Legislature expressing support for a proposed constitutional amendment that mandates a balanced federal budget. The resolution emphasizes the intention of the state to ratify this amendment under Article V of the United States Constitution. HJR25 aims to reinforce fiscal responsibility at the federal level, arguably in response to ongoing concerns about national debt and fiscal policy management. The resolution represents a legislative push toward the concept of ensuring that federal expenditures do not exceed revenues, thereby fostering greater financial discipline at the federal level.

Contention

While proponents of HJR25 argue that a balanced budget amendment is necessary to maintain fiscal discipline and prevent future debt crises, critics warn that such an amendment could severely limit the federal government's ability to respond to economic emergencies. Opponents raise concerns that mandating a balanced budget could lead to cuts in essential social programs and services, particularly during times of economic recession when increased spending may be necessary. The debate surrounding the resolution reflects broader divisions in fiscal policy philosophy, with some viewing it as a mechanism for accountability, while others see it as a potential threat to economic stability.