Texas House Bill HJR44

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

• Filed: 12/14/16

Caption

Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing an amendment to the constitution to provide for a federal balanced budget.

Impact

If enacted, HJR44 could potentially shift the dynamics of fiscal responsibility at the national level by promoting a balanced budget requirement. This amendment, once proposed and ratified by the necessary states, could compel the federal government to exercise greater fiscal discipline, reducing the likelihood of accruing high national debt. Additionally, it emphasizes the role state legislatures play in influencing federal policy, asserting their authority in the constitutional amendment process. The long-term implications might involve tighter budgetary controls and a reevaluation of federal funding priorities.

Summary

HJR44 proposes that the Texas Legislature apply to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution with the specific purpose of proposing an amendment aimed at mandating a federal balanced budget. The resolution underscores the belief that excessive federal spending has led to a significant national debt and that state legislatures have a responsibility to exert control over federal actions for the sake of their constituents' liberties. The proponents argue that this initiative could lead to crucial fiscal reforms at the federal level, ensuring that government expenditures do not exceed revenues in the absence of a national emergency.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HJR44 tends to lean towards fiscal conservatism, resonating particularly with legislators and constituents who advocate for reduced government spending. Supporters see it as a proactive measure to curb reckless fiscal policies and promote accountability among federal representatives. Conversely, opponents may view such a convention as risky, fearing unforeseen consequences that could arise from altering the federal constitution. This tension reflects broader national debates on governance and the balance of power between state and federal authorities.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve concerns about what implications calling a convention might entail; there are apprehensions regarding the potential for a 'runaway convention,' where broader constitutional changes could be proposed beyond the scope of a balanced budget amendment. Critics also argue that the necessity of a federal balanced budget may overlook the complexities of economic fluctuations and emergencies, raising questions about the adaptability of such a requirement. The discussions around HJR44 highlight crucial ideological divides regarding fiscal management and the extent of government financial oversight.