Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1015

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 

Caption

Relating to procedures for incorporation or establishment of another form of local government for certain areas subject to a regional participation agreement.

Impact

The provisions of SB1015 could significantly streamline the process of municipal incorporation, enabling districts to engage with their communities in assessing governance preferences. By allowing local governments to determine their governance structure alongside direct voter involvement, the bill may foster a more responsive governance model. The stipulated procedures might alleviate some bureaucratic hurdles and promote efficient local administration, particularly in areas that have historically faced challenges in transitioning to formal government structures.

Summary

Senate Bill 1015 focuses on the incorporation or establishment of local government forms in specific areas governed by regional participation agreements. The bill amends sections of the Local Government Code to allow districts that have entered such agreements to initiate elections for incorporation as municipalities or for adopting alternate forms of government. Importantly, it sets the criteria and processes through which these elections can be conducted, thereby empowering local governance structures under established frameworks.

Sentiment

Analysis of the discussions and voting history surrounding SB1015 reveals a supportive sentiment among legislators, with the bill receiving a unanimous vote of 146 yeas during its third reading. Supporters argue that the bill presents an innovative approach to local governance by enhancing community engagement and providing a clear path for areas that wish to form new municipalities or adopt alternative governmental structures. This collective support indicates a recognition of the need for adaptable governance solutions in response to local conditions.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is positive, some potential points of contention lie in the practical implications of the bill’s implementation. Critics may raise concerns regarding the adequacy of community representation in regional participation agreements. Questions may also arise related to the equitable distribution of resources and the impact on existing governance in districts poised for incorporation. Moreover, the requirement for a proposed initial property tax rate to be presented alongside the incorporation question could lead to debates about fiscal responsibility and the financial implications for voters in these districts.

Companion Bills

TX HB2110

Identical Relating to procedures for incorporation or establishment of another form of local government for certain areas subject to a regional participation agreement.

Similar Bills

CA AB1924

Sacramento Regional Transit District.

CA AB2986

County of Los Angeles: East Los Angeles: report.

NJ AR71

Urges State Board of Education to require school districts to incorporate financial literary instruction into mathematics and social studies curriculum.

NJ AR41

Urges State Board of Education to require school districts to incorporate financial literary instruction into mathematics and social studies curriculum.

CA AB1052

Sacramento Regional Transit District: taxes.

AL HB349

Innovation Districts; establishment of by counties and municipalities as public corporation authorized; provide for the powers of innovation districts.

AL SB242

Innovation Districts; establishment of by counties and municipalities as public corporation authorized; provide for the powers of innovation districts

WV HB2605

Require that a public service district board that represents more than one community have at least one member from each community