Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1296 Latest Draft

Bill / Senate Committee Report Version Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            By: Huffman S.B. No. 1296
 (In the Senate - Filed March 3, 2017; March 13, 2017, read
 first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs;
 April 3, 2017, reported adversely, with favorable Committee
 Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 9, Nays 0; April 3, 2017,
 sent to printer.)
Click here to see the committee vote
 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR S.B. No. 1296 By:  Huffman


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the review of ballot proposition language for certain
 political subdivision elections.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subchapter C, Chapter 52, Election Code, is
 amended by adding Section 52.0721 to read as follows:
 Sec. 52.0721.  REVIEW OF BALLOT PROPOSITION LANGUAGE.
 (a)  This section applies only to an election on a measure held by a
 political subdivision located primarily in a county with a
 population of more than 120,000.  This section does not apply to an
 election for which a statute provides the ballot proposition
 language.
 (b)  Not later than the 109th day before an election, a
 political subdivision seeking to hold an election on a measure
 shall submit to the regional presiding judge of the administrative
 judicial region that the political subdivision is located in:
 (1)  the ballot proposition language; and
 (2)  a brief statement on the purpose of the
 proposition.
 (c)  A political subdivision that is located in two or more
 administrative judicial regions may select the administrative
 judicial region to which the political subdivision submits the
 proposition language for review.
 (d)  A judge receiving a submission under Subsection (b)
 shall appoint three judges from the administrative judicial region
 to serve on a panel to review the ballot proposition language before
 the election may be held.
 (e)  If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
 clear and understandable to the average voter, the panel shall
 approve the language of the proposition for the ballot.
 (f)  If the panel finds the language of the proposition is
 not clear and understandable to the average voter or does not make a
 finding on the proposition language before the 31st day after the
 date the panel is appointed, the language is disapproved and may not
 be used on the ballot at the election. The panel may provide the
 political subdivision with rewritten ballot proposition language
 that is clear and understandable to the average voter for use in the
 election.
 (g)  Following disapproval under Subsection (f), the
 political subdivision may:
 (1)  hold the election with the rewritten ballot
 proposition language provided by the panel; or
 (2)  submit revised ballot proposition language for
 approval by the panel in the manner provided under Subsections (e)
 and (f).
 (h)  To the extent of a conflict between this section and any
 provision of law requiring a political subdivision to hold an
 election on a measure within a certain period, this section
 controls.
 SECTION 2.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
 to an election ordered on or after the effective date of this Act.
 An election ordered before the effective date of this Act is
 governed by the law in effect when the election was ordered, and the
 former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
 SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2017.
 * * * * *