Texas Senate Bill SB1400

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to state banks, state bank holding companies, and branches of foreign banks.

Impact

The implications of SB1400 are significant for the state banking industry as it seeks to modernize and enhance the operational frameworks applicable to state banks and foreign entities. One key feature of the bill is the introduction of measures that ensure greater transparency and efficiency in how bank applications are processed. The changes are intended to promote a competitive banking environment while ensuring compliance with both state and federal banking regulations.

Summary

SB1400 addresses the regulatory framework governing state banks, state bank holding companies, and branches of foreign banks operating in Texas. The bill amends various sections of the Finance Code to streamline processes such as the application and notification required when a Texas bank holding company is acquired or when foreign banks seek to establish branches in the state. The amendments aim to clarify the roles and responsibilities of the banking commissioner, particularly regarding the approval process for banks and bank holding companies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB1400 appears to be positive, with stakeholders recognizing the importance of adapting financial regulations to foster growth and maintain competitiveness in the banking sector. Supporters believe that the bill will create a more favorable business environment for banks, facilitating expansion and improving service delivery for customers. However, concerns exist around the potential complexities involved in meeting the new requirements and whether these changes will lead to unintended regulatory burdens.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the balance of regulatory authority between state and federal agencies as it pertains to the operations of both state banks and foreign banks. Critics raise concerns that the bill could inadvertently favor larger banking institutions at the expense of smaller, local banks. Moreover, distinct viewpoints among lawmakers regarding the oversight functions of the banking commissioner indicate a division on how best to ensure both growth and oversight in the banking sector.