Texas Senate Bill SB1736

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the liability of a person who allows handguns to be carried on property owned, controlled, or managed by the person.

Impact

The enactment of SB1736 significantly alters the landscape of civil liability in Texas. By providing immunity to property owners concerning the status of handgun permissibility on their premises, the bill aims to reduce the potential for lawsuits stemming from firearm-related incidents. This shift can have far-reaching implications for business practices, as property owners may feel a greater sense of security in allowing the carrying of handguns without the fear of litigation. As a result, the legislation may encourage more property owners to adopt more permissive stances on concealed carry policies, potentially changing public attitudes regarding gun ownership in these spaces.

Summary

Senate Bill 1736 addresses the legal liability concerning property owners regarding the carrying of handguns on their premises. The core objective of the bill is to amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by introducing a new chapter that establishes the legal ramifications of failing to prohibit the carrying of handguns by license holders on privately owned properties. Specifically, the legislation clarifies that evidence of a property owner not exercising their option to bar handguns—such as the absence of proper signage—cannot be used as evidence in lawsuits regarding injuries occurring on the property, thereby offering legal protection to property owners against such claims.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB1736 have been deeply polarized among legislators and the public. Proponents of the bill, primarily from the Republican side, view it as a necessary measure for supporting Second Amendment rights and ensuring that property owners are not unfairly penalized for choices regarding handgun policies on their property. Conversely, critics argue that the bill undermines accountability and poses safety risks, as it effectively reduces responsibilities that property owners might have in ensuring the safety of their patrons. These divergent views underscore ongoing tensions in the debate about gun rights and public safety.

Contention

One key point of contention surrounding SB1736 is the balance between property rights and public safety. Opponents express concerns that by shielding property owners from liability, the bill may inadvertently promote environments where gunowners are not adequately regulated. This could lead to scenarios where accidents or violent incidents occur on property that might have otherwise opted to restrict firearms. The discussion reflects broader societal questions regarding the impact of reduced legal accountability for gun-related issues, especially in establishments frequented by the general public.