Texas Senate Bill SB1782

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the elimination of certain formula funding and dropped course restrictions for returning adult students at public institutions of higher education and to the tuition rate that may be charged to those students for certain excessive undergraduate hours.

Impact

The bill modifies existing regulations on course drops and measurements of credit hours that count toward formula funding, ensuring that returning students do not face penalties for dropped courses as they reintegrate into academic life. By prohibiting the exclusion of semester credit hours for courses dropped (up to three times) by students who meet specific criteria, the legislation helps to secure funding for institutions while supporting adult learners. This represents a shift toward a more inclusive education policy that acknowledges and addresses the unique barriers returning students may face.

Summary

SB1782 aims to enhance educational opportunities for returning adult students at public institutions of higher education in Texas by eliminating certain restrictions on course drops and formula funding. The bill specifically allows adult students who have re-enrolled after a break in their education for 24 months to drop an additional course beyond the standard limit. This provision is intended to provide greater flexibility for students facing challenges as they return to their studies after an extended absence, effectively reducing the academic pressure on them.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB1782 was generally positive, particularly among advocates for adult education and workforce development. Supporters argued that the changes would significantly support working adults who wish to continue their education and enhance their employability. However, some critics raised concerns about the potential for these changes to create disparities in funding between institutions and to impact overall course availability if too many students opt to drop courses at higher rates.

Contention

One notable point of contention among legislators was the balance between increased flexibility for students and the implications for state funding allocations. Some members expressed concern that the proposed amendments could lead to higher academic failures among returning students if they relied too heavily on the ability to drop courses. This led to debates about how to monitor academic performance and ensure that institutions maintain standards while accommodating the needs of returning adult learners.