Texas Senate Bill SB2268

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 159; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

Impact

This bill has significant implications for local governance in Montgomery County, particularly in terms of public financing for infrastructure development. It provides a framework for establishing a municipal utility district, which can operate independently in financing its utilities and public works without direct reliance on state funding. The ability to impose taxes and issue bonds empowers the district in accomplishing its objectives while promoting local economic growth through improved infrastructural capacity.

Summary

SB2268 relates to the creation of the Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 159. The district is established to facilitate public utility services and infrastructure in the area, with powers that include the ability to assess fees, impose taxes, and issue bonds to finance various projects. The bill specifically outlines the district's authority to manage utilities and infrastructure improvements, emphasizing the construction and maintenance of roads, as well as other necessary improvements like storm drainage systems.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB2268 appears to be supportive among members of the legislative process, as indicated by its smooth passage through both the Senate and House with overwhelming votes. The establishment of the utility district is viewed positively as it is expected to enhance service provision and infrastructure development. However, concerns about the balance of power in local governance and the potential for overreach in tax assessments may arise from local constituents, emphasizing the need to define clear operational boundaries for such districts.

Contention

One notable point of contention in discussions surrounding SB2268 is the provision concerning eminent domain. The bill states that the district may not exercise the power of eminent domain, which is significant as it ensures that land acquisition for district purposes must rely on voluntary agreements rather than state coercion. This provision aims to alleviate concerns of local residents about potential overreach by governmental entities in land acquisition, thus reinforcing property rights while still allowing for necessary infrastructural development.