Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB353

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the use of revenue received as a result of the purchase of attendance credits to supplement the basic allotment under the public school finance system.

Impact

The implications of SB353 are significant for the public school finance framework in Texas. By modifying the calculation of the basic allotment to exclude certain revenues, the bill intends to create a more transparent funding model that will help to stabilize financial resources for school districts. This measure could lead to more predictable funding levels, addressing concerns from school administrators regarding the fluctuating nature of specific revenue sources tied to attendance credits.

Summary

Senate Bill 353 focuses on the allocation of revenue generated from the purchase of attendance credits within the Texas public school finance system. Specifically, the bill proposes amendments to multiple sections of the Education Code to ensure that a portion of the basic allotment for schools excludes revenues derived from these attendance credits. This change aims to provide a clearer foundation for how school funding is determined and allocated, potentially impacting the financial stability of school districts across Texas.

Conclusion

Overall, SB353 represents a legislative attempt to refine the public school finance system in Texas, ensuring that funding structures are sound and reflect actual educational needs. The bill’s passage could pave the way for future discussions regarding school funding reform and the necessity for continued investment in the education sector.

Contention

Notably, discussions around SB353 may involve contention over how the exclusion of attendance credit revenue could impact districts differently based on geographic and economic factors. Some stakeholders might argue that this change could disadvantage districts that rely heavily on attendance credits for funding, leading to disparities in financial resources. Conversely, proponents may argue that the exclusion fosters a fairer distribution of state funds that ensure all districts maintain equitability in educational opportunities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.