Texas Senate Bill SB602

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the establishment of a restructuring commission to evaluate each state supported living center.

Impact

If SB602 is enacted, it will significantly impact how the state addresses the needs of individuals requiring support for intellectual and developmental disabilities. The restructuring process initiated by the commission aims to ensure that state resources are allocated efficiently and that the remaining centers serve their communities effectively. The bill mandates that proceeds from the closure of any centers be used exclusively for services supporting individuals with disabilities, establishing a framework for reallocation of state funds in a manner that continues to prioritize these communities.

Summary

Senate Bill 602 establishes a Restructuring Commission tasked with evaluating state supported living centers in Texas. The commission will assess whether these centers can be consolidated, downsized, repurposed, or closed based on the need for such facilities in the state. Specifically, the bill limits the commission's recommendations for closures to no more than five centers and requires that they evaluate several factors including service quality, operational costs, and community resources available to support residents post-closure.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward SB602 appears mixed among stakeholders. Advocates for individuals with disabilities may view the bill as an opportunity to improve service quality and efficiency within state supported living centers. They might support efforts to evaluate and transition residents to community-based services. However, there could also be concern among families and advocates that closures may lead to reduced access to necessary services and support, particularly in areas where community resources are limited.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB602 center on the potential impact of center closures on existing residents and their families. Critics warn that the implementation of the bill risks significant disruption for individuals who may find it challenging to transition to community-based settings. There are fears that some areas may not have the capacity to accommodate the needs of those displaced, potentially leading to a lack of adequate care. Additionally, the specific criteria used by the restructuring commission in their evaluations may raise concerns over favoritism or inadequacy in addressing unique local needs.