Texas Senate Bill SCR33

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Approving the amended 2009 settlement agreement between the State of Texas and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Impact

The passage of SCR33 indicates a shift in focus for the management and oversight of the supported living centers. By approving the Amended Agreement, the Texas Legislature facilitates a revised approach that not only strives for compliance with federal regulations but also prioritizes the welfare of the individuals receiving services. The emphasis on outcomes and community integration reflects a broader trend towards deinstitutionalization in the provision of care for individuals with disabilities, aligning the state's practices with contemporary standards of care and community living.

Summary

SCR33 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution aimed at approving an amended settlement agreement between the State of Texas and the U.S. Department of Justice. This agreement stems from a 2009 settlement that addressed issues related to the state's supported living centers and intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The resolution endorses changes to the existing agreement that emphasize improved monitoring processes and enhanced outcomes for individuals transitioning from institutional settings to community living. The resolution signifies a commitment to addressing the concerns raised by the federal government regarding services provided by these facilities.

Sentiment

The resolution received broad bipartisan support, reflecting a consensus among Texas legislators on the importance of improving services for individuals with disabilities. The sentiment surrounding SCR33 was generally positive, as legislators recognized the necessity of enhancing the quality of care and ensuring compliance with federal requirements. This collaboration is viewed as a crucial step towards reforming the system to better serve vulnerable populations, indicating a collective commitment to social responsibility and ethical governance.

Contention

While the resolution has been largely well-received, it is critical to note that any changes to the settlement agreements imply ongoing oversight and accountability measures. There may be concerns regarding the adequacy of resources allocated for the enhanced monitoring processes and whether these improvements will translate into tangible benefits for individuals served by the Centers. Scrutiny from advocacy groups will likely continue as the state implements the amendments to ensure that the best outcomes are achieved for all stakeholders involved.