Proposing a constitutional amendment limiting to two the number of terms for which a person may be elected or appointed to hold certain state offices.
If passed, SJR11 would establish a new standard for term limits in Texas state government, thereby affecting the eligibility of current office holders who have already served two terms. It acknowledges that any term completed before January 1, 2018, would not count towards this limit, effectively allowing some current politicians to continue serving beyond the two-term threshold under specific circumstances. The temporary provision included in the bill requires the law to be reassessed before it expires in 2035, indicating a potential for future discussion on the effectiveness of the term limits put in place.
SJR11 proposes an amendment to the Texas Constitution to limit individuals to two terms in state offices that are elected or appointed and voted on statewide. This proposed change impacts significant positions, including the governor, lieutenant governor, and attorney general, among others. The resolution aims to promote government accountability by preventing long-term incumbency in key state roles and is designed to encourage new candidates to enter public service. The language of the bill reflects a growing sentiment among some lawmakers for electoral reform and the enhancement of democratic principles.
Debate surrounding SJR11 may arise from differing opinions on the necessity and implications of term limits. Proponents argue that restricting terms can lead to fresh ideas and perspectives in government, which helps to prevent stagnation and corruption among seasoned politicians. On the other hand, critics may contend that experienced leaders are crucial for maintaining continuity in governance and that term limits could result in a loss of valuable institutional knowledge. The passage of SJR11 could thus provoke significant political discourse on the balance between accountability and experience in Texas state politics.