Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SR936 Latest Draft

Bill / Enrolled Version Filed 05/31/2017

                            By: Creighton S.R. No. 936


 SENATE RESOLUTION
 BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the State of Texas, 85th
 Legislature, Regular Session, 2017, That Senate Rule 12.03 be
 suspended in part as provided by Senate Rule 12.08 to enable the
 conference committee appointed to resolve the differences on
 Senate Bill 2014 (the administration of certain water districts)
 to consider and take action on the following matter:
 (1)  Senate Rule 12.03(1) is suspended to permit the
 committee to amend text not in disagreement in proposed SECTION 5
 of the bill, in amended Section 54.016(a), Water Code, to read as
 follows:
 (a)  No land within the corporate limits of a city or
 within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a city, shall be
 included in a district unless the city grants its written
 consent, by resolution or ordinance, to the inclusion of the land
 within the district in accordance with Section 42.042, Local
 Government Code, and this section. The request to a city for its
 written consent to the creation of a district, shall be signed by
 a majority in value of the holders of title of the land within the
 proposed district as indicated by the county tax rolls [or, if
 there are more than 50 persons holding title to the land in the
 proposed district as indicated by the county tax rolls, the
 request to the city will be sufficient if it is signed by 50
 holders of title to the land in the district]. A petition for the
 written consent of a city to the inclusion of land within a
 district shall describe the boundaries of the land to be included
 in the district by metes and bounds or by lot and block number, if
 there is a recorded map or plat and survey of the area, and state
 the general nature of the work proposed to be done, the necessity
 for the work, and the cost of the project as then estimated by
 those filing the petition. If, at the time a petition is filed
 with a city for creation of a district, the district proposes to
 connect to a city's water or sewer system or proposes to contract
 with a regional water and wastewater provider which has been
 designated as such by the commission as of the date such petition
 is filed, to which the city has made a capital contribution for
 the water and wastewater facilities serving the area, the
 proposed district shall be designated as a "city service
 district." If such proposed district does not meet the criteria
 for a city service district at the time the petition seeking
 creation is filed, such district shall be designated as a
 "noncity service district." The city's consent shall not place
 any restrictions or conditions on the creation of a noncity
 service district as defined by this chapter [Chapter 54 of the
 Texas Water Code] other than those expressly provided in
 Subsection (e) of this section and shall specifically not limit
 the amounts of the district's bonds. A city may not require
 annexation as a consent to creation of any district. A city shall
 not refuse to approve a district bond issue for any reason except
 that the district is not in compliance with valid consent
 requirements applicable to the district. If a city grants its
 written consent without the concurrence of the applicant to the
 creation of a noncity service district containing conditions or
 restrictions that the petitioning land owner or owners
 reasonably believe exceed the city's powers, such land owner or
 owners may petition the commission to create the district and to
 modify the conditions and restrictions of the city's consent.
 The commission may declare any provision of the consent to be
 null and void. The commission may approve the creation of a
 district that includes any portion of the land covered by the
 city's consent to creation of the district.  The legislature may
 create and may validate the creation of a district that includes
 any portion of the land covered by the city's consent to the
 creation of the district.
 Explanation:  The change is necessary to clarify that a
 request to a city for its written consent to the inclusion of land
 within a district in accordance with Section 42.042, Local
 Government Code, shall be signed by a majority in value of the
 holders of title of the land within the proposed district as
 indicated by the county tax rolls.
 (2)  Senate Rule 12.03(4) is suspended to permit the
 committee to add text on a matter not included in either the house
 or senate version of the bill by adding proposed SECTIONS 3 and 4
 to the bill to read as follows:
 SECTION 3.  Section 49.302(b), Water Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 (b)  A petition requesting the annexation of a defined
 area signed by a majority in value of the owners of land in the
 defined area, as shown by the tax rolls of the central appraisal
 district of the county or counties in which such area is located,
 [or signed by 50 landowners if the number of landowners is more
 than 50,] shall describe the land by metes and bounds or by lot
 and block number if there is a recorded plat of the area and shall
 be filed with the secretary of the board.
 SECTION 4.  Section 54.014, Water Code, is amended to read
 as follows:
 Sec. 54.014.  PETITION. When it is proposed to create a
 district, a petition requesting creation shall be filed with the
 commission. The petition shall be signed by a majority in value
 of the holders of title of the land within the proposed district,
 as indicated by the tax rolls of the central appraisal district.
 [If there are more than 50 persons holding title to the land in
 the proposed district, as indicated by the tax rolls of the
 central appraisal district, the petition is sufficient if it is
 signed by 50 holders of title to the land.]
 Explanation:  The change is necessary to change the
 petition requirements for creation of or annexation of land to
 certain special purpose districts.
  _______________________________
  President of the Senate
  I hereby certify that the
  above Resolution was adopted by
  the Senate on May 28, 2017, by the
 following vote:  Yeas 31, Nays 0.
  _______________________________
  Secretary of the Senate