Texas House Bill HB1112

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the removal of signs indicating that a freestanding emergency medical care facility is operational.

Impact

The bill modifies the Health and Safety Code to stipulate immediate removal of any signs that misrepresent a facility's operational status. By implementing this requirement, the bill reinforces the state's commitment to ensuring that facilities operate transparently and according to their licensing status. Furthermore, the provision enables the Texas Department of Health to seek a temporary restraining order or an injunction against facilities that violate these requirements, thereby empowering the state to enforce compliance actively.

Summary

House Bill 1112 focuses on the removal of signage that indicates a freestanding emergency medical care facility is operational. The overarching intent of the bill is to ensure that such signs are promptly taken down when a facility closes or when its operating license expires, is suspended, or revoked. This regulatory measure aims to mitigate potential confusion for the public regarding the operational status of these health facilities, thereby enhancing public safety and health standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1112 appears to be overwhelmingly supportive across the legislative floor. The bill was passed unanimously by both the House and Senate, indicating a consensus on the importance of clear communication to the public about emergency care services. The lack of opposition suggests recognition of the need for stringent measures to protect public health and prevent misinformation regarding available medical services.

Contention

While there has been a general agreement on the importance of the bill, notable contention could arise regarding the practical implementation of these regulations, especially concerning compliance responsibilities for facility owners. As facilities may incur costs related to signage changes, some stakeholders may voice concerns about economic implications. However, the broader consensus remains focused on public health priorities, suggesting that any contention may be minimal and manageable.