Relating to legislative review and approval of certain state agency rules.
If enacted, HB112 would alter the existing process by which state agency rules are implemented, potentially slowing down the introduction of regulations that could impact various sectors. Proponents argue that this will protect businesses and taxpayers by subjecting major regulatory changes to legislative scrutiny, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability. However, critics may view this as an impediment to necessary regulatory actions, potentially delaying important health, safety, or environmental regulations that require timely implementation.
House Bill 112 proposes a significant change to the regulation of state agency rules in Texas by requiring legislative review and approval for certain proposed rules. Specifically, it mandates that any rule anticipated to have an economic impact of $20 million or more must be reviewed by a standing committee before it can be enacted. This provision is intended to enhance legislative oversight over state agency regulations, ensuring that significant economic impacts are considered before rules are finalized. The bill designates a process for referral and voting on these rules, with strict timelines for legislative committees to act on proposed regulations.
Key points of contention surrounding HB112 involve the balance of power between state agencies and the legislature. Supporters assert the necessity of legislative approval for high-impact regulations to prevent unforeseen economic consequences, while opponents may argue that it could over-politicize and hinder timely responses to issues that state agencies are specifically tasked to address. The requirement for unanimous approval from committee members for such agency rules raises concerns about possible deadlock situations, where essential regulations could be suspended indefinitely if consensus is not reached.