Texas House Bill HB1166

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to wrongful exclusion of handgun license holders from certain property owned by or leased to a governmental entity and to certain offenses relating to the carrying of handguns on that property.

Impact

The implications of HB 1166 are significant as it would potentially expand the rights of handgun license holders, allowing them greater access to government properties without the fear of wrongful exclusion. By streamlining the process through which complaints can be filed against governmental entities that violate this law, the bill aims to empower citizens to challenge any unlawful signage or exclusionary practices. The law requires that any complaints filed with the Attorney General be substantiated with evidence of the violation.

Summary

House Bill 1166 seeks to amend existing laws concerning the exclusion of handgun license holders from certain properties owned or leased by governmental entities in Texas. The bill explicitly prohibits state agencies and political subdivisions from notifying license holders that they are barred from entering or remaining on such properties, unless such prohibition is backed by specific laws outlined in the Penal Code. This legislation aims to clarify the rights of licensed handgun carriers within government-owned premises.

Conclusion

If enacted, HB 1166 will take effect on September 1, 2019, altering the landscape of handgun regulations in Texas regarding government properties. The bill’s proponents argue it is necessary to uphold the rights of citizens who are licensed to carry handguns, while opponents raise valid concerns about the broader implications for safety and local governance.

Contention

Controversy around the bill is expected, particularly from those who are concerned about public safety and the appropriateness of allowing firearm carryers in government spaces. Critics may argue that the measure could lead to unsafe conditions in areas where weapons are present, particularly within public buildings. The examination of local governance also arises, as some may view this bill as a preemption that undermines local control over public safety regulations.