Texas House Bill HB2319

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to certain coordinated county transportation authorities.

Impact

This bill impacts state laws by providing a clear framework for the governance of transportation authorities. By ensuring that both local municipalities and county officials have a role in the oversight of public transportation decisions, the bill seeks to enhance cooperation between different levels of government. It also aims to encourage more efficient and effective public transportation services across jurisdictions by allowing for collaborative decision-making. The inclusion of specific qualifications for board members could also lead to more informed oversight.

Summary

House Bill 2319 focuses on the governance of certain coordinated county transportation authorities in Texas. It amends sections of the Transportation Code to define and modify the composition of the board of directors overseeing these authorities. The bill specifies that boards will include members appointed by both founding municipalities and the county commissioners court, thus ensuring representation from both local and wider governance structures. Additionally, it clarifies rules for filling vacancies and the conditions under which municipalities can appoint board members.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2319 appears to be largely supportive among legislators and stakeholders who see it as a necessary step towards improving public transportation governance. Proponents view the bill as a means of reinforcing accountability and ensuring local interests are represented effectively. However, there may also be concerns raised about the balance of power between municipalities and county government, especially given the varied interests at play in different regions of Texas.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely revolve around how the bill's changes will affect existing boards and the authority of municipalities versus counties in making transportation decisions. Some critics may argue that the new appointment rules could lead to a consolidation of power in larger municipalities, potentially marginalizing smaller communities. Additionally, the requirement for a three-fifths vote for certain appointments may cause tensions regarding local governance and representation.