Texas House Bill HB2718

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to authorizing an increase in the student union fee at The University of Texas at Arlington.

Impact

The passage of HB 2718 will potentially enhance the financial resources available for the Student Union at The University of Texas at Arlington. This could lead to improved facilities and services for students, contributing to a better campus experience. The legislation requires any increase in the fee to be approved by a majority vote from participating students, ensuring that the students have a say in the financial decisions that impact them directly. This democratic approach may foster a sense of agency among the student body regarding funding of their union activities.

Summary

House Bill 2718 seeks to authorize an increase in the student union fee at The University of Texas at Arlington. The new provisions stipulate that the board of regents of The University of Texas System may levy a student union fee up to $150 per student for each regular semester and up to $75 for each summer term. This amendment allows the fee to be raised from its previous maximum of $39 per student during regular semesters and $19.50 during summer sessions, thereby providing necessary funds to finance, construct, operate, maintain, and improve the Student Union Building at the university.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2718 appears to be generally positive, particularly among those who view enhancements to the student union as beneficial for student life and engagement. Supporters of the bill likely argue that improved facilities can lead to greater student involvement and satisfaction. However, some opposition might arise from students concerned about any financial burden such fee increases could impose, particularly on economically disadvantaged students. The requirement for student voting on fee increases helps address these concerns, but still presents an avenue for dissent.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB 2718 may include the financial implications for students, particularly those who may be unable to afford the increased fees. While the intent is to enhance the student experience, the increase could disproportionately affect lower-income students. Furthermore, debates may arise around the transparency of how the funds raised will be utilized, and whether the proposed improvements align with the actual needs and priorities of the student body. Balancing increased funding for campus facilities with the financial realities of students remains a crucial discussion point.