Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3240

Caption

Relating to a study by the Legislative Budget Board concerning the long-term effects of regulating tuition rates and amounts charged by public institutions of higher education.

Impact

The implications of HB 3240 are significant as it seeks to address pressing issues surrounding tuition rates in Texas. The study would assess how changes in regulation could affect student access to higher education, particularly for disadvantaged and underrepresented groups. Furthermore, it would explore the potential financial impacts on institutions if they were forced to adhere to standardized tuition rates, including the risks of reduced revenue and the need for alternative funding sources like endowments to offset any losses.

Summary

House Bill 3240 aims to direct the Legislative Budget Board to conduct a comprehensive study on the long-term effects of regulating tuition rates and amounts charged by public institutions of higher education. The bill proposes that the study should evaluate the balance between making higher education more affordable and accessibility for students while ensuring that these institutions have the necessary revenue to maintain quality education and remain competitive with out-of-state institutions. It requires a detailed analysis of the current tuition setting authority of these institutions and how potential regulatory changes might impact their financial stability and student enrollment.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment towards HB 3240 appears to focus on a collaborative approach to improving higher education funding and access. Some stakeholders may welcome the proactive stance on addressing affordability, viewing the bill as a necessary step toward more equitable education policies. However, there may also be concerns from institutions regarding the autonomy over their tuition decisions and the risks associated with potential revenue losses, leading to a complex dialogue on the bill's outcomes.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 3240 will likely arise from the differing perspectives on state versus institutional control over tuition rates. Critics may argue that regulating tuition too rigidly could undermine the financial health of public institutions, while proponents might emphasize the need for a more standardized approach to ensure that education remains accessible. The outcomes of the proposed study could lead to significant policy debates regarding legislative oversight of higher education financing in Texas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.