Texas House Bill HB3557

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to civil and criminal liability for engaging in certain conduct involving a critical infrastructure facility; creating criminal offenses.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3557 will have a significant impact on Texas laws concerning property rights and public safety. By establishing criminal penalties for specific actions related to critical infrastructure, the bill aims to deter vandalism, sabotage, or other forms of interference. It introduces a legal framework that allows property owners to seek damages through civil courts if their infrastructure is compromised. This change is expected to enhance the accountability of individuals and organizations that may harm critical infrastructure, thereby protecting essential services that impact public welfare.

Summary

House Bill 3557, known as the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, seeks to define and establish specific civil and criminal liabilities for actions involving critical infrastructure facilities. This includes protections against damage or destruction of infrastructure such as pipelines, refineries, and electrical plants. Under this bill, individuals may face severe penalties for entering or damaging these facilities without consent, characterizing certain actions as felonies. The bill aims to enhance the security and operational integrity of facilities deemed critical to the state's infrastructure.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding HB 3557 appears mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for safeguarding vital infrastructure against potential threats, especially in a context where such facilities are increasingly vulnerable to activist actions. On the other hand, critics express concerns that the bill could lead to overreach and disproportionately punish protesters or individuals engaging in civil disobedience. The debate seems to revolve around balancing the protection of critical infrastructure while ensuring that civil liberties and the right to protest are respected.

Contention

Notable points of contention include how the broad definitions of 'critical infrastructure' and 'damaging' actions under the bill may criminalize a wide range of activities, raising questions about the implications for free speech and protest actions. Additionally, the penalties outlined—for instance, classifying certain infractions as felonies—have sparked discussions on whether the bill prioritizes corporate interests over the rights of citizens. The implementation of this law could set precedents for future legislation regarding the intersection of civil liberties and security measures.