Texas House Bill HB3601

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the recognition by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board of competency-based education degree plans for members of the Texas military forces.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3601 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws governing higher education, particularly in how degrees can be conferred to veterans and active service members. By formally recognizing competency-based education, the bill supports a more flexible educational path for military personnel, acknowledging their prior knowledge and skills gained through service. This change will likely encourage institutions to develop programs that align with military training, thereby enhancing educational accessibility for those in uniform.

Summary

House Bill 3601 aims to facilitate the recognition of competency-based education degree plans specifically for members of the Texas military forces. The legislation amends the Education Code to allow the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to approve degree programs that utilize alternative methods for assessing mastery of content, which is particularly relevant for those with military experience. This approach seeks to provide greater opportunities for military personnel to attain higher education credentials in a manner that accommodates their unique training and service experiences.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3601 appears to be overwhelmingly positive among legislators and advocacy groups focused on military and educational issues. Supporters of the bill highlight its potential to improve educational outcomes for military members, emphasizing the need for a system that recognizes their skills and experiences. This consensus indicates a collective agreement on the importance of facilitating educational opportunities for veterans, which is often seen as a crucial benefit of military service.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for HB 3601, notable contention may arise regarding the implementation specifics and the criteria for competency assessment. Concerns could center around how different institutions will interpret and apply these new provisions, particularly ensuring that standards for degree attainment remain rigorous. Additionally, there might be discussions about the adequacy of support provided to institutions in aligning their programs with military competencies, as well as the potential challenges of maintaining quality assurance while promoting flexibility in education.