Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Texas House Bill HB775

Caption

Relating to the reporting of political contributions and political expenditures by out-of-state political committees.

Impact

The potential impact of HB 775 on state laws revolves around the scrutiny it places on contributions from out-of-state entities. By enforcing stricter regulations, it is expected to alter the way political campaigns in Texas are funded, promoting a more transparent political environment. The inclusion of specific compliance measures for out-of-state committees signifies a push towards ensuring that political financing in Texas is not heavily influenced by external interests, which could compromise local governance. This measure is essential for maintaining the integrity of Texas elections and safeguarding them from possible undue influence by non-residents.

Summary

House Bill 775 addresses the regulation of political contributions and expenditures made by out-of-state political committees, aiming to enhance transparency in political financing. The bill amends several sections of the Texas Election Code to require out-of-state political committees to comply with specific reporting requirements. This includes mandates for these committees to designate an officer responsible for notifying candidates or officeholders of contributions or expenditures they make on behalf of these individuals. By doing so, the bill aims to ensure that candidates are aware of any financial support they receive from outside the state, maintaining a level of accountability in the political process.

Contention

While HB 775 has garnered support from those prioritizing transparency in political contributions, there may be contention concerning the practical implications of enforcing these regulations. Detractors might argue that such requirements could hinder the ability of out-of-state political committees to effectively participate in Texas elections. Additionally, the broader impact on political campaigns regarding potential constraints on financial support could spark debates over the balance between transparency and the freedom of speech in political financing. Overall, the bill addresses significant issues surrounding the influence of money in politics but could also unveil complexities in its implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits