Texas House Bill HJR87

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment requiring the payment of reparations to the next of kin of certain victims of the state's convict leasing system.

Impact

The proposed constitutional amendment is expected to have significant implications for state laws regarding compensation and historical accountability. It emphasizes the state's recognition of past injustices and establishes a framework for providing reparations aimed at addressing the negative legacy of the convict leasing system. The mechanism put forth by this bill is intended to be systematic, with the Texas Historical Commission overseeing the evaluation of reparations. This sets a precedent for how the state addresses similar issues stemming from its past actions and could potentially influence future legislation regarding reparations for other historical injustices.

Summary

HJR87, proposed by Representative Reynolds, is a joint resolution that seeks to amend the Texas Constitution to require the payment of reparations to the next of kin of certain victims of the state's convict leasing system. This amendment specifically addresses the 95 victims whose remains were found at the former Imperial State Prison Farm in Sugar Land in 2018. The resolution outlines that the Texas Historical Commission will be responsible for identifying these next of kin and determining the amount of reparations owed, which will be equal for each eligible individual. These reparations will be funded from appropriated state funds, emphasizing a state-level acknowledgment of the harm caused by historical injustices associated with the convict leasing system.

Contention

Despite its intention to rectify historical wrongs, HJR87 may face opposition regarding the logistics of reparations distribution and the broader implications of such actions. Critics may argue about the fairness of financial reparations, the potential for setting a precedent for other claims, and questions about funding allocation. Furthermore, opponents might discuss the efficacy of reparations as a means of achieving justice, while supporters argue that financial compensation is a necessary step towards healing and accountability. The resolution will likely ignite discussions about how best to deal with the historical injustices within the societal framework and the state's moral and financial responsibilities moving forward.